logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.04.20 2017고단2099
사기방조
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

F and G around December 18, 2014, around F and G established H (hereinafter “H”) and F and G to jointly carry out projects, such as investing capital necessary for H’s projects in commercializing technologies and ideas (such as the development and commercialization of new parts used for display and projects related to the restoration of hard disks) developed by H, and F and G, and F have overall control over the aforementioned tasks, including the representative director of the victim company and G, for the victim company.

H deposited KRW 1 billion in capital and KRW 500 million in the account of the victim company by January 2, 2015 pursuant to the above joint business agreement. F and G were able to execute the funds of the victim company only with the approval of H. To this end, the Plaintiff’s bank account’s passbook, official certificate, and bank transaction seal. F and G stated “the Defendants” in the written indictment. However, according to the evidence of this case, the evidence of this case appears to be “F and G” and thus correct ex officio.

When submitting a written estimate, etc. after visiting H office, the execution of the funds of the victim company was completed by J after the interim approval by J and the final approval by H representative director.

F and G requested H to pay the cost of equipment related to the technology development of the victim company due to financial difficulties of K K (hereinafter referred to as “K”) operated by F (hereinafter referred to as “K”), and received the difference from the customer and received it from K employees to use it for the benefit of K employees.

1. In accordance with the above public offering, Defendant AF prepared a written estimate as if he sold Sscoo in M to I for KRW 357 million, despite that the Scoo in the office of the management of the company operating by the Defendant in Scoo-si L around January 2015 was the actual KRW 115 million. However, Defendant AF prepared a written estimate as if he sold Scoo in M to I for KRW 357 million.

arrow