1. The defendant received on April 17, 1990 from the plaintiffs with respect to the area of 212 square meters for C forest land in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

Basic Facts

The status of the parties and inheritance-related plaintiffs D (D; hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff's preference") is a person born on the E date and died on March 31, 1942.

On April 30, 1929, the F reported adoption was inherited solely by the F.

F had ASEAN H, I, the Network J, K, the Plaintiff A, his married L, and M between the wife G, and died on February 13, 1985.

He, who is the head of family, succeeded to the family, and L/M was married at the time of death.

G died on February 24, 1994

J made the plaintiff B,O, and son P between the wife N and died on January 27, 1996.

Attached Form

As indicated in the portion of inheritance following the deceased F, G, and J's death, the legal portion of inheritance of the plaintiff A is 17/105 [==1/35 of the plaintiff's statutory portion of inheritance of the plaintiff A to the deceased F's legal portion of inheritance of the plaintiff A to the deceased F 2/15 networkF}. The legal portion of inheritance of the plaintiff B is 34/945 [34/95 of the portion of inheritance of J = 17/105 [1/35 of the legal portion of inheritance of J to the deceased F 2/15 networkF [1/5 x 1/5 x 1/7] of the legal portion of inheritance of the plaintiff B to the J].

In the land investigation division for Yangju-gun, Yangju-gun, Yangju-gun, Q 64 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”) around 1912, it is written that S (S; hereinafter referred to as the “instant assessment titleholder”) was under the circumstances of Yangju-gun, Yangju-gun, Q 64 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”) around 1912, around 1912.

On April 17, 1990, the Defendant made a registration of preservation of ownership (hereinafter “registration of preservation of ownership of this case”) on the land of this case by the North Korean registry office of the court.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 6 (if there are serial numbers, including each number), and D, the plaintiffs' preference to the purport of the whole pleadings, is the land of this case.