logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.06.05 2015고단610
사기등
Text

1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes Nos. 1, 2, and 3 in its holding, 1 year and 6 months, 4 in its holding, and 5.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[1] On January 6, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Suwon District Court on May 1, 201, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 1, 201. [2] On January 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 12, 2015, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Daegu District Court on July 17, 2015.

I. 2015 Highest 610 (Defendant A);

1. On February 10, 2014, the Defendant against F with respect to fraud, on February 10, 2014, shall pay the victim a loan of KRW 30 million to the victim’s house located in Ansan-si, Seoul, with the loan of KRW 30 million from the victim’s house located in G, and shall pay the victim with the loan of KRW 2-3 months.

It is expected that the body of the people in the possession of the head of the Gu can get the people to board and pay one million won per month in the amount of money.

“The Court made an order.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay or provide a passenger car.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 29 million from the victim to the Daegu Bank Account (H) in the name of the Defendant.

2. On May 2014, the Defendant against F around the beginning of May 2014, 2014, at the victim’s house, the Defendant would sell the F in KRW 3,80,000 as he/she would bring about the difference because he/she had a person seeking to drink.

‘A seal impression certificate necessary for the Isch Rexn car and the registration of transfer from the injured party is issued.

However, even if the defendant sold the vehicle owned by the victim as above, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the price to the victim.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and by deceiving the victim, he got the above Bosch Rexrothn vehicle from the victim.

II. 2015 Highest 746

1. Determination of not guilty of Defendant A’s fraud as follows.

2. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants (the fraud against the Victim J around August 2014) Defendant A is a used car with a used car in Ansan-dong K used car trading complex.

arrow