1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a person who purchased Incheon apartment unit No. 3 (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”), and the plaintiff was an attorney-at-law belonging to the law firm E.

Article 1(1) (Scope of Deposits: (2) Other party to the so-called F case (e.g. cancellation and termination of the sale contract, damages, unjust enrichment claim, etc.): Indication of the competent court, agency, etc. of the apartment seller, Korea, Incheon Metropolitan City, Korea Land and Housing Corporation, G Corporation, etc. (3): Incheon District Court or Seoul District Court (4) case scope of acceptance: 200,000 won (including additional tax) contingent fees for the first instance lawsuit and the preservation lawsuit;

1. 6% (including surtax; hereinafter the same shall apply) of the “the difference after subtracting the market price appraised from the sale price of an apartment from the sale price” when accepting a claim for cancellation or cancellation of a contract;

2.The amount calculated at the following rates by applying differential rates to the economic profit value when the claim for compensation for damages or the claim for reduction of the sale price is made - the amount calculated at the following rates: 7% of the economic benefit value - the economic benefit value exceeding 5% but not exceeding 10%: 8% of the sale price - the economic benefit value exceeding 10% but not exceeding 15% of the sale price: 9% of the economic benefit value exceeding 15%: 10% of the sale price:

2. Time of payment: Receipt of money.

B. On August 29, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract for delegation of a lawsuit with law firms E (hereinafter “instant delegation contract”) stipulating the scope of acceptance and remuneration as follows.

C. The total number of buyers of the instant apartment including the Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking the refund of the sale price (hereinafter “related lawsuit”) against H (hereinafter “H”) and I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”) which is the contractor for the construction and sale of the instant apartment, including the Defendant, and the law firm E (hereinafter “related lawsuit”) on behalf of 354 petitioners of the relevant lawsuit at the first instance court in accordance with the delegation agreement with the buyers, such as the instant delegation agreement.