The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (the imprisonment of one year and two months, the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours, the order to disclose personal information for three years, the order to restrict employment for five years, and the number of categories 1 to 3 of the evidence) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following factors: (a) although the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the Defendant committed a second offense during the period of repeated crimes of the same kind; (b) there are many records of having been punished for a sex offense other than the above repeated crimes; and (c) there are two previous criminal records having been punished for a sex offense; and (d) there are no particular changes in sentencing conditions compared with the lower court’s judgment; and (b) there are no changes in sentencing conditions, the lower court’s sentence is too too unreasonable and thus, the Defendant’s above assertion by the Defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.