1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From November 1, 2017, the above-mentioned A

subsection (b).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 20, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the lease deposit amounting to KRW 15,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,400,000, and the lease term from May 25, 2016 to May 24, 2018. At that time, the Defendant paid the said deposit to the Plaintiff and used the instant real estate by delivery.

B. On December 2016, the Defendant did not pay the rent, and on April 4, 2017, the Plaintiff expressed to the Defendant that the instant lease contract was terminated on the grounds that the rent was unpaid.

C. The defendant occupies the real estate of this case until now.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 2-1, and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above fact-finding, the instant lease agreement was lawfully terminated on April 4, 2017 due to the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination due to the Defendant’s failure to pay rent, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff as the duty of restitution, and to pay unjust enrichment calculated by the rate of KRW 1,400,000 per month from November 1, 2017 to the date the delivery of the instant real estate is completed, as sought by the Plaintiff.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.