1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for an additional determination under paragraph (2) as to the defendant’s assertion added in the court of first instance, and therefore, it is citing it as it is

2. Judgment on the defendant's argument added in the trial

가. 먼저 피고는, 원고와 이 사건 합의를 한 자는 E이고, 피고는 공사대금채권자들의 대표자 지위에서 이 사건 합의서에 서명하였을 뿐이며, 원고로부터 수령한 3억 원은 모두 공사대금채권자들에게 분배하였으므로(피고 수령액은 400만 원 정도이다), 피고를 상대로 위 3억 원 전액의 반환을 구하는 것은 부당하다는 취지로 주장하나, 앞서 본 이 사건 합의의 내용 등에 비추어 볼 �, 피고가 들고 있는 사정들만으로는 이 사건 합의에 따라 위 3억 원의 반환을 구하는 원고의 청구가 부당하다고 볼 수 없으므로, 피고의 위 주장은 이유 없다.

B. In addition, at the time of the agreement in this case, the defendant agreed to purchase the land of this case at the price pursuant to the notice sent by the auction court to E as of February 21, 2013 (the minimum sale price of KRW 3,384,750,00 shall be KRW 3,400,961,610, and the procedural costs shall not remain if the creditor reimburses the creditor's claim, which takes precedence over the creditor's claim, and thus, the creditor shall apply for the purchase at the price and provide sufficient guarantee if there is no purchase declaration meeting the above price, and if the above matter is not performed, the creditor shall be notified that the auction procedure will be revoked.) but did not purchase the land at such price, which was not successful, and this was fulfilled the condition of suspension or cancellation against the principle of good faith.