logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.07.23 2020나2010037
계약명의변경 청구 등의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

ex officio deemed.

According to the records, ① the attorney of the first instance court filed an appeal against the judgment of the first instance without attaching the amount of stamps of the appellate court on March 11, 2020; ② on February 13, 2020, the court of the first instance issued an order to pay KRW 69,200 and service fees of KRW 57,600 to the attorney of the first instance court on February 13, 2020; and the attorney of the first instance issued an order to pay KRW 69,200 and delivery fees of KRW 57,60 on February 25, 2020; ③ this court issued an order to additionally pay KRW 561,200 within five days from the date of service to the plaintiff’s attorney; on July 9, 2020, the court issued an order to revise the contents of additional payment of KRW 561,200 to the plaintiff’s attorney; but on the same day, the plaintiff’s and the attorney of the first instance were not paid within the said additional period.

If so, the plaintiff's appeal is inappropriate because it fails to comply with the order of correction without attaching stamps pursuant to the provisions of law. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow