beta
Text
Defendant
In addition, all appeals filed by the person who requested the attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The sentence (five years of imprisonment) imposed by the lower court on the Defendant and the person who requested to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) is too unreasonable.
B. Prosecutor 1) The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant in the part of the case against the Defendant is too unfasible and unreasonable.
2) It is unreasonable for the lower court to dismiss the Defendant’s request for the attachment order of this case even though there is a risk that the Defendant would recommit robbery.
2. As to the part of the case of this case, each of the crimes of this case against the defendant committed the crime of this case is that the defendant took property by carrying a deadly weapon at one night and took it over twice at a convenience store, etc., and the defendant took it with a deadly weapon, thereby inflicting an injury on the victim F by taking the property in a singing room, taking it over the mobile phone, etc., taking it as a security, or by deceiving it on the Internet three occasions, and taking the proceeds of goods and borrowed money into the taxi with no intent or ability to pay the money, and obtaining the pecuniary profits equivalent to the taxi fee, and the crime is very poor, and the damage suffered by the victims due to each of the special robbery and fraud in this case is not so small that the victim of the special robbery of this case is not recovered, the victim of the crime, P, C, and D are not recovered, the victim, the victim, and D wanting a strict punishment against the defendant at the court below and the trial of each party, and the defendant was subject to several criminal punishment on several occasions.
On the other hand, all of the crimes of this case are recognized by the defendant, and the basic crime of the injury resulting from robbery of this case was only against the defendant, and the degree of injury suffered by the victim F was not limited. The victim F of the injury resulting from robbery of this case, victim I of the crime resulting from special robbery, and victim Q Q of the crime of fraud want to be punished against the defendant.