beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant D is the representative director of Nonparty F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) for the purpose of real estate sale and purchase, sales agency business, etc., and Defendant E changed its trade name into “Co., Ltd. I” on July 15, 2013 for the purpose of real estate sale and purchase, rental business, etc. from November 24, 2009 to June 7, 2012.
The whole before and after the change of trade name shall be referred to as "G".
the representative director was in office.
The Plaintiffs purchased each real estate listed in the separate sheet from April 2009 to September 2010 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) from Defendant D, etc., as the introduction of Defendant C, which is the type of the Plaintiff A.
B. On April 6, 2009, Plaintiff A purchased from Defendant D the land listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 97,020,000, the land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 of May 12, 2009, and the land listed in paragraph (3) of the attached Table No. 3 of the attached Table No. 155,71,000, respectively, and acquired from Nonparty F the land listed in paragraph (4) of the attached Table No. 4 of June 8, 2009 from Nonparty F in KRW 61,740,000, and the land listed in paragraph (5) of the attached Table No. 7,820,400, respectively.
In addition, on February 15, 2010, Plaintiff A and B purchased each land in the attached Form 6 to F from Nonparty F in KRW 114,013,200.
C. From Nonparty G, on May 28, 2010, Plaintiff A purchased the land indicated in Section 9 of the Attached Table No. 110,000,000, and Defendant B acquired the land listed in Section 10 of the Attached Table No. 10 on June 24, 2010, respectively.
Although the plaintiffs asserted that they acquired the land listed in paragraph (11) of the attached Table No. 11 from the non-party G on November 4, 2010, the above land only exists in a sales contract (Evidence No. 5-8 of the attached Table No. 5), and according to the copy of the register (Evidence No. 6-10 of the attached Table No. 10 of the above land), there is no registration for transfer of ownership in the plaintiffs' name as to the above land, and there is evidence to prove that the plaintiffs acquired ownership in