A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 4, 2016, at around 20:00, the Defendant obstructed the operation of the said hospital by force for about 30 minutes, such as listening to the Defendant’s speech that the Defendant was sent back to the emergency room of C hospital located in Seosan-si B, and hearing the Defendant’s refusal D’s drinking, and the patient was sent back to the emergency room of C hospital, and the patient was suffering from the said emergency room while the patient was in a bruced condition. The Defendant d’s noise was humpted by force to the victim E (38 years old), who is the employees of the said hospital, and huming and huming the victim E (38 years old), thereby obstructing the operation of the said emergency room.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, that the Defendant avoided the disturbance of the same content as that of paragraph 1, the police officer G who was called out after receiving a 112 report, and who was recommended from the slope H to suspend the duty of care for emergency patients and leave the emergency room out of the emergency room. “I am flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick and flick flick flick G's chest flick flick flick at the hospital, and then I am flick flick flick and the above G.

At the last time, the G was threateninged by “I am, I am, I am,” and “I am, I am,” with the word “I am, I am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to C hospital emergency department photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the observation of protection and the order of community service, shall interfere with one crime (Interference with the business) (the scope of recommendations).