Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

While the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road, which is the owner or owner of a cargo to cut down B, the Defendant was not subject to the automobile mandatory insurance, even though he was not subject to the automobile mandatory insurance:

A. On January 6, 2009, the above-mentioned motor vehicle is operated in the vicinity of the intersection by means of the right of Japanese Myeonk-do from the strike around 11:36;

B. Around 17:20 on June 20, 2009, the said vehicle was operated on the front side of a lot of clater in the degree of harmony in the Soyang-gu, Goyang-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reply to details of traffic regulations of vehicles in cases, such as a report on detection of an offender, a report on the quantity of non-insurance vehicles in operation, a medical insurance contract (B), the current status of automobile registrationers (B),

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 46 (2) and 8 of the former Guarantee of Compensation for Damages of Motor Vehicles (wholly amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012)

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment of concurrent crimes with the punishment stipulated for the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act as of June 20, 209, with heavy penalty);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;