1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the following is dismissed or added among the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and that the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even in addition to the entries of the evidence No. 13 and 14 and the fact-finding results of the fact-finding of the Seoul National University Hospital branched by this court and the Seoul National University Hospital, and it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition to the determination that there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff, and therefore, it is cited in accordance with Article

The working environment division of 17th parallel shall be improved to "working environment assessment".

Each "this Court" in the 5th 11th , 12th , 6th , 7th , 7th , and 13th , shall be considered as "court of first instance".

In 6th 6th 16th 16th am "the above evidence" means "the above evidence and evidence No. 5".

7. The following shall be added, as it is a “wre” of the 7th page:

On May 30, 2013, the Plaintiff indicated the mandatory records of the J Hospital as Smokinger.

[] The 7th page 12 of the 7th page " shall be appraised," and the following shall be added:

It shall not be deemed that the dust concentration in the time when the plaintiff performed dust work (the dust concentration in the time when the plaintiff performed dust work) and the dust concentration in the result of the assessment of the working environment of cement mortar workers conducted by the E Research Institute.

Even if such circumstance alone makes it difficult to readily conclude that the above evaluation is unfair.

) On the 7th page 15th page 7, “Opinion presented without identifying the concentration and period” is considered as “Opinion presented at the status where the concentration and period have not been verified properly.”

7.On the 7th page, the following shall be added:

On May 30, 2013, the Medical Records of the Plaintiff (J Hospital for the Plaintiff), written “Ambre on May 30, 2013,” “Ambre on August 23, 2013,” “Ambre on the bicycle level from 80 to 100km”, and on August 28, 2014, respectively, “Amre on the bicycle, from Ycheon to mark”.

2.2.3