The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged, despite that the Defendant did not have inflicted injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged, and did not have any intent to injure the victim, and even if not, it constitutes a legitimate defense. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one million won in penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the assertion of misunderstanding the facts and legal principles, the following circumstances recognized by the court below comprehensively based on the evidence duly adopted and examined at the court below. ① The victim stated in the investigative agency and court of the court below that “the defendant was faced with flabing the flat of the victim on May 27, 2015, walking the victim’s flat, walking the victim’s flat with the flat, walking the victim’s flat with the flat, cutting the victim’s flat with the flat with the flat, cutting the part of the victim’s left flat with the flat, and inflicting an injury on the victim.” The victim’s statement was specific and consistent; ② the victim’s treatment at the M hospital on May 29, 2015; ② the victim’s flatal flat and tension, the wall’s flat, the wall’s flat and flat of the victim’s flat.