logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2012.09.12 2012노1346
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and eight hours of social service) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment that the defendant confessions the facts of the crime, the vehicle operated by the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, and it is recognized that the victims and the defendant agreed smoothly, but there was a criminal record of the violation of the Road Traffic Act 8 times including a suspended sentence due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and a fine for the violation of the Road Traffic Act. The defendant stated that "at least 3 p.m. on the date of the accident, he will drink the horse, and leave the scene of the accident without mind by shocking the head after the accident." However, in light of the victim C and the defendant's statements before and after the crime of this case, C appeared at the investigative agency to the effect that "the vehicle of the defendant itself was 1 minute from the end of the accident, and the defendant was present at the scene of the accident, and the defendant was not present at the police station, and the defendant was not present at the seat of the accident, and the defendant was not present at the seat of the accident."

The defendant still remains.

arrow