A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2012, at around 23:05, the Defendant driven B Poter Cargo under the influence of alcohol 0.140% in blood alcohol concentration in front of the fluorite in the fluore of Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, fluor-si, fluor-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on actions taken against an employer, and report on the status of the employer-employed driver;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the hostile inquiry;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime, even though he/she had been sentenced to a fine due to drinking driving twice, the criminal liability for the sentencing reason under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is not somewhat weak.

However, a suspended sentence is to be imposed on the condition that an order to attend a lecture is issued only once in consideration of various sentencing factors, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledges a crime.