The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On 17, 2016, the Defendant, on 17, 201. 02:21 on 17, 2016, was a proxy engineer in front of the D cafeteria located in Sinh City.

When the defendant talks with the victim E, an acting as an acting engineer, and the defendant asked for an additional fee to get a customer in the middle, the victim saw the victim as a mixed-level.

The Defendant expressed her desire to do so by “pherb kn. He inevitably,” and assaulted the victim by putting the face of the victim on his hand and her head with her face, such as putting him and her clothes.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is obvious that the victim withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on April 20, 2016, after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.