1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) established and operated C Schools which are “Various Schools” under Article 2 subparag. 7 of the Higher Education Act and the cyber college-type lifelong educational establishment under Article 33(3) of the Lifelong Education Act to achieve the aforementioned establishment purpose.

On November 24, 1991, the Plaintiff is a person who was appointed as a full-time lecturer in the social welfare department at C School and served for two years on September 1, 201 as an assistant professor (not later than August 31, 2013) and was subject to the disposition of refusal of re-election from the Intervenor on June 30, 2014.

In accordance with Article 29(1) of the Government Organization Act (amended by Act No. 12114, Dec. 24, 2013) and Article 3 of the Addenda, the Minister of Education succeeded to human resources development policies, school education, lifelong education, and academic affairs among the duties of the Minister of Education, Science, and Technology; hereinafter “Minister of Education”) of the Intervenor’s refusal disposition of re-employment on June 30, 2014, the Intervenor conducted a comprehensive audit on the Intervenor from May 21, 2012 to June 5, 2012, and ordered the Intervenor to take corrective measures such as 42 cases of status status, 9 administrative measures, and 6 cases of financial measures on May 21, 2012.

On February 12, 2013, after the resolution of the board of directors on February 18, 2013, an intervenor filed an application with the Minister of Education for authorization for the self-harm pneumoconiosis of a C school with the Minister of Education on May 29, 2013. The Minister of Education approved the closure of C school on August 31, 2013 to an intervenor on May 29, 2013. The C school was closed on August 31, 2013.

On June 5, 2013, an intervenor notified the plaintiff of his rejection of reappointment, and the plaintiff appealed against the disposition of rejection of reappointment and filed an appeal against the defendant. The defendant filed an appeal against the defendant on September 9, 2013.