logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.11.18 2016고단2048
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. At around 19:22 on January 28, 1994, A, who is an employee of the defendant, committed a violation against the defendant's duty by refusing to comply with C's direction-setting guidance, with the suspension signal and gambling of B, which is a patrol team belonging to the Glanam-do Road Management Office, the Maranam-do Road Management Office, the Maranam-do Road Management Office, the Mancheon-do Office, and the direction-setting direction.

2. The legal provision applied to the above facts charged was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow