Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. At around 19:22 on January 28, 1994, A, who is an employee of the defendant, committed a violation against the defendant's duty by refusing to comply with C's direction-setting guidance, with the suspension signal and gambling of B, which is a patrol team belonging to the Glanam-do Road Management Office, the Maranam-do Road Management Office, the Maranam-do Road Management Office, the Mancheon-do Office, and the direction-setting direction.
2. The legal provision applied to the above facts charged was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality.
Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act