logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.02.04 2015고단913
상습사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, attempted fraud, at the Gwangju District Court on December 2, 2005, and 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud in the Gwangju District Court's interest support on October 107, respectively. On November 16, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual fraud at the Gwangju District Court and completed the execution of the sentence on June 9, 201.

The Defendant habitually committed the following crimes or attempted fraud.

[2015 Highest 913]

1. On June 15, 2013, the Defendant is the victim at the home of the victim D, who had been in the Republic of Korea between 09:20 on June 15, 2013, to help the disabled.

Essatis also will be raised from Grade 3 to Grade 2.

In order to help other persons with disabilities now, the money will be lent to 70,000 won as the money is insufficient, and it will be repaid after the loan.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he/she thought to use it as his/her own living expenses, and he/she did not have any intention or ability to complete payment.

The Defendant, as above, had the victim enticed and received KRW 70,00 from the victim for the borrowed money from the victim to September 27, 2013, and had no intent or ability to repay the borrowed money, even if he borrowed money from the victim until September 27, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 10,000,000 from seven victims as shown in the list of crimes in the attached crime.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving victims habitually.

[2015 Highest 1027]

2. On February 6, 2015, the Defendant retired from office in the “G” operated by the Victim F in Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, with the knowledge of the head of the personnel management division.

By requesting the personnel department and the head of the agency, he/she will be employed as the staff of the intellectual corporation for the children.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not know about the chief of the personnel division of the Intellectual Property Corporation and received money from the injured party.

arrow