logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.26 2015노6799
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution) is too unreasonable.

2. Ex officio determination: (a) the lower court applied Articles 3(1) and 2(1)3 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016; (b) the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016; (c) Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act with regard to the part of the instant facts charged, which inflicted an injury on the victim as a dangerous object.

In this regard, according to the Punishment of Violences Act amended on January 6, 2016, the above provision, which stipulates that a person who committed an injury by carrying a deadly weapon or other dangerous object shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for more than three years, was deleted. On the same day, Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, which stipulates that a person who committed an injury by carrying a dangerous object shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for more than one year, but not more than ten years, was newly established. In light of the circumstances leading to the amendment of the above Act, etc., it can be deemed that in light of the fact that the previous statutory punishment was too bad, this part of the facts charged cannot be applied any more, and Article 258-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, which provides that the former Punishment of Violences, shall be applied.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below cannot be maintained as it is.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's argument, and the judgment below is reversed and it is again decided as follows.

[Re-written judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the stated in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 258-2 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 258-2 of the choice of punishment;

arrow