Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. From April 10, 2014 to 22:30 of the same day, Defendant A d'E's “E” from around 22:10 on April 10, 2014 to around 22:30 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) viewed the victim, who is the owner of the business, as drinking alcohol together with E, E, E, E, E, E, E, and E, to be seated on the job; (b) but was rejected, the Defendant obstructed the victim's duty by: (c) putting the victim into bad, on the ground that the victim's “if there is no money, whether there is no money, and whether it seems damp,” and (d) sounded the head food bar installed in the table so as to remove it on his hand; and (c) 20 minutes of the disturbance, such as drinking dust, chair, fire extinguishing, etc., which were carried out on the floor by out the outside by customers, thereby obstructing the victim's main force.

2. Defendant B

A. On April 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of 22:53, the second floor of the “E”; (b) the police officers G and police officers, who were reported and dispatched to the G and police officers, wished to arrest the Defendant-friendly A inception who had been suffering from disturbance as above; (c) the police officers, who expressed the said police officers’ desire to “I am out, and am out,” “I am out, if I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., I am., and I am.” (d) the Defendant interfered with a police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the police officer’s criminal investigation and the maintenance of public order.

B. On April 10, 2014, the Defendant continued to assault police officers G, as seen above, and immediately after being arrested at the entrance of “E” at the first floor of Lestop 1st on the charge of obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) was arrested on the charge of charges of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) on the ground that the instant patrol car was parked on the front of the said Lestop, 18Nu6319, on the ground that it was bad, and caused damage to the goods used by public offices by burning the sunlight of the said patrol car on the ground that it was bad.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Each explanatory note (on-site withdrawal);

1. The 112 patrol vehicle destroyed by B; and