A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 1092"

1. On December 26, 2016, at around 13:20 on December 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed in a bank items equivalent to KRW 143,900, total sum of KRW 143,900 (market price of KRW 24,000), one cosmetic (market price of KRW 9,900); and (b) cut off the property owned by the victim C, at D stores operated by the victim C.

2. On January 8, 2017, around 15:05, the Defendant: (a) placed in a bank an article amounting to KRW 86,00,00 in total amount of KRW 86,00,00 (market price of KRW 24,00), one cosmetic (market price of KRW 18,00), five cosmetic (market price of KRW 44,00), and stolen property owned by the victim C.

3. On February 7, 2017, around 14:08, the Defendant stored four cosmetics equivalent to a total of 85,600 won in a bank and stolen the property owned by the victim C at the place specified in the above paragraph (1).

"2018 Highest 1432"

1. The Defendant who acquired profits from the use of a card by fraud shall pay the victim F the amount of the card if he/she borrowed the credit card to the victim F at the singing room located in Pyeongtaek-si or below on April 22, 2017.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed a credit card from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the credit card to the injured party later.

The Defendant, as seen above, received a credit card delivery by deceiving the victim and then received the credit card from April 24, 2017 to April 25, 2017, taking property benefits equivalent to the same amount in a way that did not pay the card price to the victim even though the Defendant received the total amount of 2,072,90 won from G stores, etc. to G stores, etc.

2. On April 26, 2017, the Defendant shall deposit the victim’s “10 million won as of the last day of each month if he/she lends it to the victim at an influorial area (hereinafter referred to as Pyeongtaek-si Dok-dong).

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the principal and interest.

The defendant is the victim as above.