A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Certified Judicial Scriveners Act shall conduct affairs of a certified judicial scrivener as his/her business or borrow a certificate of registration of a certified judicial scrivener;

The defendant, who is not a certified judicial scrivener and is not a certified judicial scrivener, is referred to as the "chief of affairs" in the office of a certified judicial scrivener in Daegu Suwon-gu, and instead of giving a certain amount monthly amount to D as a fee for lending a certified judicial scrivener registration certificate, D does not participate in the number of cases or affairs of a defendant, and the defendant agrees with D to handle all affairs of a certified judicial scrivener on his own account, such as accepting 462 items, such as preparing documents to be submitted to the court and the public prosecutor's office by accepting 462 items as shown in the attached crime list (1) from January 5, 2011 to October 31, 2012, and receiving the amount equivalent to 43,974,900 won in total, and received the certificate of registration of a certified judicial scrivener.

2. On July 31, 2012, the Defendant, who violated the Attorney-at-Law Act, was not an attorney-at-law, and D, at the office of the above certified judicial scrivener D, has the Defendant and E working as a secretary, receive the case fees per case from the clients for the exemption of personal bankruptcy and the individual rehabilitation case, and the Defendant and E accepted the case from the clients.

As above, the case that the defendant and E accepted was transferred to F in the above office in charge of individual bankruptcy immunity cases and individual rehabilitation cases and G in the above office as an employee of the above certified judicial scrivener office, and F and G prepared necessary documents and received them from the court to perform the order of correction until the case is closed, thereby comprehensively processing all necessary affairs for the clients.

From around that time to October 31, 2012, the Defendant comprehensively handled the individual bankruptcy immunity case and the individual rehabilitation case in the same way 14 times in total, as shown in the list of offenses (2) in the attached Table (2).

Accordingly, the defendant is in collusion with D, E, and F.