A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. A special intimidation: (a) on April 8, 2016, the Defendant was driving a DNA motor vehicle on the front of the C Synsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City B in front of the C Syncheon-gu, and was making a left turn to the Korean National Police Agency in front of the C Syncheon-gu, the Defendant was making a straight turn at the time.

E Lastren driver, the victim F(30 30 h) who is the driver of the Eststren motor vehicle, had the horn string the horn to threaten the victim, and the driver of the victim's vehicle continuously moves ahead of it, and the victim's vehicle is passing ahead of it, while driving his own vehicle on the right side of the victim's vehicle, the victim was faced with the victim by driving the vehicle on the right side of the victim's own vehicle, driving the vehicle on the right side of the victim's vehicle, driving the vehicle on a sudden stop, stopping the vehicle at the right side, leaving the vehicle at the right side, and interfering with the victim's course.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim by using dangerous things.

2. On April 8, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) and driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the front of G on the front of the Ysan-gu G in the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the mobilization after receiving a report from the slope I belonging to the H District in the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the mobilization, while the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence

Even though there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, it was demanded to comply with the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument, but it was not complied with.

The Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender committing a violation of Road Traffic Act, and was demanded to comply with a drinking test by inserting alcohol in a manner of inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument three times from L of the same day to 3:12 of the same day from K of the same police station from L of the same police station to 3:32 of the same day after he/she was arrested as a flagrant offender.

Even so, the Defendant did not put the part of a drinking measuring instrument into a drinking measuring instrument, and avoided this, and did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1.