The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 28, 2018, the Defendant: (a) expressed a bath to the victim who was urged to return home from the victim C (52 tax) located in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Do, and (c) Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine b; and (d) Doctrine bbro bbbbling the victim’s bat; and (d) fladd the victim’s bridge due to the victim’

2. The instant facts charged cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent (Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act). According to the records, the victim expressed his/her intent not to be punished against the Defendant on December 10, 2018. Thus, the instant facts charged are dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.