Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a sexual traffic business in the trade name of Gangnam-gu Etel 622, 812, and 922, and Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government FF building 81 and 814, and Defendant B is a person who works as the head of the said sexual traffic business establishment.

Defendant

A은 2014. 3. 1.경부터 2014. 4. 18.경까지 위 E 오피스텔 622호, 812호, 922호, F 오피스텔 811호, 814호를 임차한 후 인터넷 섹밤 사이트에 성매매 광고를 하고, 피고인 B은 이를 보고 찾아 온 성명을 알 수 없는 남자손님으로부터 15만 원 내지 16만 원을 성매매 대가로 지급받은 후 성매매 여종업원인 H(여, 29세), I(여, 29세) 등이 대기하고 있는 방실로 안내하여 위 여종업원들로 하여금 위 성명불상의 남자손님과 성관계를 가지도록 하고, 성매매 여종업원에게 10만 원 내지 11만 원을 주는 방법으로 성매매를 알선하여 21,948,000원 상당의 수익을 얻었다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange commercial sex acts for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against I and H;

1. A criminal investigation report (Attachment of a daily account book);

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with labor

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A; Defendant A had a record of being punished two times or more for the same crime under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.; Defendant B had been punished for the same crime at the same place before the first year; Defendant B had five officetels provided in this case; the degree of the Defendants’ participation; the profits earned by the Defendants; and the business period.