beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) Plaintiff A, C, and D respectively KRW 36,65,724; and (b) Plaintiff B KRW 35,327,862; and (c) F, G, H, and H, which are the litigation acceptances of Plaintiff deceased E.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiffs' family relations 1)O married with P and died on March 18, 1979 after the plaintiff's birth of Q Q, A, Non-Party R, plaintiff D, B, and C. The former Civil Act (amended by Act No. 4199, Jan. 13, 199; hereinafter "former Civil Act").
Pursuant to the above, the wife P, Australia’s heir Q, each of 6/29 shares, each of 4/29 shares, each of 4/29 shares, each of 1/29 shares, each of 1/29 shares, and each of 1/29 shares each at the time of marriage, Plaintiff B, married with Plaintiff M, and died on October 11, 1987, and the Plaintiff M and N inherited Q in accordance with the former Civil Act.
3) R died without spouse and children on April 11, 198, and the mother P succeeded to R solely by her mother P on January 19, 2003. (4) P succeeded to P on January 19, 200, respectively, 1/5 shares of Plaintiffs A, D, B, and C, 3/25, and 25 shares of Q.
5) O’s shapes E and Plaintiff L. Since the continuation of the instant lawsuit, E died on June 14, 2018, and succeeded to E in 1/6 shares of Plaintiffs F, G, H, I, J, and K, respectively. 6) The final inheritance shares of Plaintiffs A, C, D, M, and N followingO’s death are 30/145 shares, respectively, 15/145 shares, Plaintiff B, M, 21/145 shares, and 19/145 shares of Plaintiff N.
(Calculation Details are as shown in Appendix 1). (b)
On July 19, 1966, the 1O prepared a written self-efforcing statement to the effect that the facts of violation of the National Security Act and the anti-public law, as shown in the Attachment No. 2 on July 27, 1966, were led to force without a warrant by the information of the Jeonnam Police Station and the investigators belonging to the 1O on the illegal arrest and detention. After undergoing several coercive investigations on charges of violation of the National Security Act and anti-public law on July 27, 196, the 1O made a statement on the same content as the 196 August 1, 196 and September 15, 196.