Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants committed the joint crime are those who were in charge of directors in the year 2015 of the management group of the European City D shop (hereinafter “instant shop”) and the victims E was in charge of the chairperson of the said management group in the year 2015.

A. On December 9, 2015, the Defendants: (a) indicated on the bulletin board installed between each floor of the instant commercial building, that “the public announcement of the results of the general meeting and the invalidation of the special meeting is to be made”; (b) on December 21, 2015, the Defendants posted a public announcement stating that “the public announcement of the results of the general meeting and the invalidation of the special meeting is to be made” among the participants who participated in the voting for the president of the instant commercial building, other than six executives with both the Defendants and the intent, all of whom 13 persons who participated in the voting for the reason that all of the candidates recommended by the victims were mobilized by the victim; and (c) on December 21, 2015, the Defendants posted a public announcement stating that “the public announcement will be made invalid due to the cause of disturbance of the general meeting by unilaterally mobilization of the occupants who

However, it is true that the F, the owner of the store of this case, among the occupants, was present at the general meeting and only the person who occupies the store and was entitled to participate in the election, and the F, while occupying the commercial building, did not go back without voting due to disputes over the qualifications for voting and did not go back to the election, and there was no person who mobilized the F to vote or who did not have any other qualifications.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit a false fact against the victim, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.

B. On December 23, 2015, the Defendants rejected the Defendants’ re-determination in the re-election for executive officers at the instant general meeting of the commercial building, and on January 14, 2016, the Defendants’ use of public funds as the title “report on the result of special meetings” in the bulletin board established among the elevator elevators of each floor of the commercial building of the instant commercial building as “report on the result of special meetings.”