The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the legitimate evidence revealed in the grounds of appeal in this case, it is sufficient to acknowledge that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim. Therefore, the judgment below acquitted the victim on the ground that the intention of injury is not recognized.

2. Determination

A. On March 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 02:25, the facts charged; (b) around D’s house located in Gwangju-dong-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, where the victim E (n, 66 years of age) was living at the back of Pyeongtaek D’s seat, and the victim was able to listen to D that he was able to suffer damage, such as locked by the wind, and the victim was able to play at F’s house; and (c) the victim was able to look at F’s house; and (d) the Defendant intentionally made a statement to the lower court that found the Defendant not guilty on the grounds that it was difficult to find the victim as the victim was able to find D, and that it was difficult to find that the Defendant was not guilty on the ground that there was no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant’s statement was legitimate in light of the evidence duly admitted from E’s protocol and evidence duly consistent with the evidence duly admitted by the lower court.

① Although the Defendant had a face-to-face face-to-face, the Defendant did not have any particular appraisal on that female. On the day when the instant case occurred, the Defendant saw the Defendant to drink with E along with E.

② On the day of the instant case, E and D were not the Defendant, and at the time of the Defendant’s assault claimed by E, there was only a dispute between E and D, but did not lead to any particular behavior.

D. (D) The physically handicapped is not easy to move in. (3) The defendant and D are investigated by the police.