logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.10.25 2017가단62917
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff Company is a corporation whose main business is Aluminium aluminium Aluminium Aluminium calculium calculium, and the Defendant was a person who held office in the Plaintiff Company by September 30, 2016 and was in charge of the factory site and business affairs at the time of his/her employment

B. The Defendant, from August 2016 to October 15, 2016, immediately before the Plaintiff’s withdrawal from the Plaintiff Company, handled the important business affairs of the Plaintiff from around August 2016 to around October 2016, and copied the company’s business affairs and business secrets, including information on the business partners, which are major assets of the company, to the USB and carried out them out to the outside. On October 1, 2016, the Defendant registered the Plaintiff Company as an individual entrepreneur with the trade name “C” for the same purpose as the Plaintiff Company.

C. The Defendant, using the transaction information acquired during his/her employment in the Plaintiff Company, had the said transaction partner conduct transactions with the Defendant, and reduced sales amounting to KRW 385,147,610 as of July 31, 2017, thereby incurring considerable damages to the Plaintiff.

In addition, while the defendant retires from the company, he was accompanied by D and four production staff members, etc., by leaving the core employees related to the production of the product. This led to the plaintiff's enormous quality of production.

E. The above act of the defendant is occupational breach of trust and constitutes a tort against the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff 31,000,000 won as part of the compensation for damages and damages for delay.

2. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 3 and 5 (including paper numbers) and all the arguments, the Defendant retired from the Plaintiff Company as of September 30, 2016, the Defendant registered its business with the trade name “C” on October 1, 2016, the name of “C,” and the Plaintiff Company.

arrow