The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant did not contain a knife knife, which is a deadly weapon, and the judgment of the court below which judged otherwise is erroneous in mistake of facts, even though he was unilaterally charged with the defendant A.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined in the judgment of the court below and the court below, the defendant Gap and the court below found the defendant's wife F to receive the smuggling's wages and entered the defendant's shop. The defendant's hand seems to be be knife with the defendant, the defendant's hand shows that the seized knife was in one's own seat, and the seizure protocol states that the defendant was provided with the above knife from the defendant and seized the knife. He stated that the police officer, who is the dispatched police officer, confiscated the knife with the criminal evidence under the conditions of all the defendants at the time when the defendants were all at the time. The defendant Gap and his wife, who was the defendant and his wife, made the knife's knife's knife's knife's knife's knife's knife's knife's knife's k.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.