logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고단3133
특수폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2016, at around 17:50, the Defendant reported that the victim C (44 tax) and the victim D (17 tax) will be punished for trial costs due to E and parking problems, which are the Defendant's seat, around the south-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and that the loss of the victim D (75 cm in total length) was filled by the victim C, one time, and the victim C's face was filled by the bad hand.

Accordingly, the defendant committed violence to victims by carrying dangerous articles.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of party-to-Gu;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime (opportune selection);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the fact that the defendant was not well aware of the period during which the defendant was under probation for the crime of this case; and (b) the fact that there was a record of having been punished for violent crimes; (c) recognition of and reflects the crime of this case; (d) the degree of violence is not relatively heavy; and (e) victims do not want the punishment of the defendant in agreement with the victims; and (e) the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment; (e) the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered as favorable.

arrow