A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On October 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two months for a period of ten months, due to a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) in the Daejeon District Court’s Support on the Incheon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 20, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On November 2016, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim B, at Asan-si, Asan-si, under the premise that he was married at the time, there is insufficient money to seek a house for marriage to the victim B who was on the premise of marriage at the time.

A false statement was made to the effect that a person would immediately repay his/her shares that he/she has purchased by borrowing money.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not intend to marry with the victim, while the Defendant did not have any other debt at the time, but did not have any specific property such as stocks, so there was no intention or ability to repay the debt even if he borrowed money from the victim.

Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) deceiving the victim as above, and then deceiving the victim as such, KRW 8,000,000 on November 21, 2016, and KRW 9,000,000 on December 7, 2016, and the same month.

8. KRW 2,00,000 was transferred to a bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the accused;

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired a total amount of 19,000,000 won property interest.

2. Around April 2016, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E, who was under the premise of marriage at the time, made a false statement to the victim E, who was under the premise of marriage at the time, stating that “The amount of a loan exceeds KRW 40 million, but if the Defendant borrowed money, he/she would receive a loan by raising the credit rating after he/she fully repaid the loan with the money.”

However, the Defendant did not have the intent to marry with the victim, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if it was difficult to repay part of the loan with the said money due to the fact that it was difficult to raise the credit rating and additional loan even if it was given due to the fact that there was no intention to marry with the victim.

Defendant 2.