logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.07 2017나70342
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant, who carried on business with D, supplied metal products worth KRW 33,803,000 from August 29, 2013 to May 13, 2014. The Plaintiff was paid KRW 10,000 out of the price of the goods.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 23,803,000 won for the unpaid goods and damages for delay.

2. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone was concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and accordingly, it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Plaintiff supplied the pertinent goods to the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff’s Intervenor to supply metal goods by e-mail, etc., and accordingly, it is only recognized that the Plaintiff’s Intervenor supplied goods to the Defendant without dispute between the parties.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow