Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants jointly operate the vehicle rental business in the name of the name of the “Cheongdam E branch of the Company E” and “F Cheongdam branch of the Company F Cheongdam branch of the Company,” and at the same time operate the vehicle rental business in the Hanam-si G from the Hanam-si.

1. Defendants in violation of the Special Act on Insurance Fraud were introduced from Seoul and Gyeonggi-do import vehicle with a vehicle damaged by traffic accidents to lease a siren to the borrower during the repair period of the vehicle, and the vehicle or the vehicle for which the guarantee period of the repair of the vehicle does not exist, or which has not been secured by the free-riding construction contract, as if the vehicle was a vehicle before the traffic accident had been constructed, were issued with a false free-riding construction guarantee of the “H” to claim against the damaged insurance company for the insurance proceeds of the vehicle, and to collect the insurance proceeds of the accident loan by claiming the rental fee by means of increasing the rental days by adding the rental period of the vehicle to one day on the ground of the construction work of the free-riding.

Accordingly, Defendant A is in charge of accounting, accounting, and distribution, and plays the role of claiming insurance proceeds to the insurance company. Defendant B and C are engaged in the business of borrowing and lending accidents against the imported vehicle with the borrower and contact the borrower with the insurance company to issue a false statement to the insurance company as the vehicle that had been engaged in a free-riding construction work before the accident. In collusion, Defendant B and C did not act in carrying out a single-level work and directly or by ordering H’s staff I to issue a false free-riding construction guarantee. On June 8, 2017, Defendant A was involved in D’s workplace located in Hanam-si, D, and JA6 car that was repaired due to the U.S. traffic accident after June 1, 2017, and even if the said vehicle did not carry the free-riding construction before the traffic accident, and thus, is entitled to the insurance benefit payment for the repair cost.