logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.09.02 2014구합103625
거래정지처분취소 청구의소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant’s contract 1) concluded a goods contract with the Defendant on September 28, 2012 with respect to the products of the Defendant and the Defendant’s contract period from September 28, 2012 to March 31, 2014, with a view to creating a new space, such as Pergola and park, at the request of an end-user institution. 2) The Plaintiff concluded a goods contract with the Defendant and the Defendant on the goods of KRW 2,11,927,000, which were set up in order to create a new space at the request of an end-user institution in a national shopping mall operated by the Defendant.

3) On February 6, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a revised contract with the Defendant to change the contract period to KRW 7,067,175,600 by September 30, 2014, and the contract amount to KRW 7,067,175,600. (B) The Plaintiff’s records of the suspension of transaction were as follows: (a) on August 9, 2013, the Defendant requested the Korea Testing and Research Institute for Construction and Living Environment (hereinafter “Korea”) to inspect the goods of the spreaders scheduled to be installed in the handed over park; and (b) on September 9, 2013, the goods inspection conducted on September 9, 2013, it was deemed that there was a serious defect due to

2) Based on the result of the inspection of the aforementioned goods on September 13, 2013, the Defendant is determined to have failed to meet the standards as a result of the inspection of supply by a specialized institution, and is subject to the former conditions for the quality control of the goods purchase contract (amended by Ordinance of the Public Procurement Service No. 1198, Apr. 14, 2015; the same applies hereinafter

(C) Pursuant to Article 14-2, the State-designated shopping mall was ordered to suspend the Plaintiff’s transactions for one month. (c) Gwangju Metropolitan City Mining Area supply and apology, and the instant disposition 1) The Gwangju Metropolitan City Mining Area, an end-user institution, demanded the Plaintiff to supply two standards products (DSP-5371, DSSP-5062, hereinafter “instant spread”) among the Plaintiff’s spread, and requested the Korea Construction Environment Examination and Research Institute to inspect the goods on July 9, 2014.

2 한국건설생활환경시험연구원의 2014. 7. 24.자 물품검사 결과, 전체 시험항목 중 ‘목재 휨 강도’...

arrow