1. The Seoul Western District Court 2016 Ghana437306 has executive force between Company D and the Defendant.

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, it is recognized that the reasons for the claim are stated in attached

Therefore, the plaintiff shall be a successor to the claim based on the judgment of the case entered in the order. Thus, the junior administrative officer of this court, etc. is obligated to grant the plaintiff a succession execution clause to the plaintiff who is a successor to D in order to have the plaintiff enforce compulsory execution against the defendant based on

In regard to this, the defendant alleged to the effect that half of the principal was repaid out of the defendant's debt against D, but the subject of examination in the lawsuit for granting the succeeding execution clause is limited only to the fulfillment of conditions or the existence of succession, and it is not permissible that the execution obligor asserts the grounds for objection regarding the claim in the lawsuit for granting the succeeding execution clause without filing a lawsuit for objection against the claim.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.