A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the violation of the Road Traffic Act in Seoul Southern District Court on August 30, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 7 of the same year, and is currently under suspended sentence.

In addition, on March 10, 201, the Seoul Southern District Court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA HG car.

1. On August 8, 2015, around 03:19, the Defendant driven a DNA car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.143% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license in approximately 2km from the new-ro 9-gil 45-gil, Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the same new-ro 9-gil 45-ro modern apartment parking lot from the new-ro 73th of the new-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, at around 03:30 on the same day.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Inception measures) on the same day, the Defendant driven an automobile with blood alcohol concentration of 0.143% without obtaining a driver’s license, as described in the preceding paragraph at around 03:20 on the same day, and led the Defendant to make a bypass from the surface of the earth to the surface of the earth at the vicinity of the intersection of the front E-distance of the same Gu.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to make a right-hand after checking whether a person engaged in driving service is safe prior to a right-hand and right-hand.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the right-hand turn to one-lane of the defecter, and the Defendant was negligent in driving the right-hand turn to the left at the right-hand turn from the galside to the galside of the Guro basin according to the normal signal of the mast, and received the front door of the g taxi driving by the Defendant’s car driver.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s foregoing negligence in the course of performing his/her duties to repair the front door of the taxi 847.