logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.13 2016고단4447
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of one year and two months, Defendant D’s imprisonment of eight months, Defendant E and F, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, “2016 Highest 4447,” is a siren operator operating G (hereinafter “G”), Defendant F is a siren operator operating H (hereinafter “H”). Defendant D is a siren operator operating Y Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”) and J Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “J”). Defendant E is a siren operator operating G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “K”). Defendant C is a siren operator operating L, M, Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “L”), and N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”), respectively.

Defendant

A, in collusion with owners of car rental companies who do not meet the requirements of ownership of one of the criteria for registration and maintenance of car rental business, A had already been exported and had only vehicle registration certificates sold in the Republic of Korea without any vehicle in the name of these companies so that the registration of automobile rental business can be maintained by transferring the ownership in the name of these companies, and was paid fees for that.

Defendant

A was known to the general public.

C. At the request of P, documents necessary for the registration of transfer of each vehicle entered in the list of crimes in which false registration of transfer can be made have been delivered to the owner of the vehicle rental business and conspired with the owner of the vehicle rental business to make the registration of transfer of the vehicle to the vehicle rental business.

1. In order to implement the conditions of ownership ownership ownership of 50 vehicles, the number of the criteria for the registration and maintenance of the car rental business, in collusion with O and P, Defendant A and B (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as “the Defendants”), the facts at the registration office of Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was located in 241, on July 31, 2015, are false stating that Defendant B’s G did not purchase any R car from Q (hereinafter “ Q Q”) from Q (hereinafter referred to as “W”) but the said vehicle was purchased from Q.

arrow