A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Suwon District Court for the crime of intrusion on a structure, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 12, 2015.

At around 18:00 on March 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) went into a “E restaurant” for the operation of the Victim D, which is located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si C; (b) went into a cafeteria where the victim and the employees of the restaurant live, through the cafeteria gate, and intrudes the victim’s inside the cafeteria where the victim resides, through the cafeteria gate; and (c) went into a theft, the Defendant 1.2 million won and six half of cash located on the floor of the inside the cafeteria (one hundred and twenty half of the gold Ban, one one of the gold Ban, one of two of the gold Bans of 18 K K, one of the gold Ban 18.75g gblurbs; (d) the gold gate, two of the gold b) and the gold 2, and one of the gold strings, with a precious metal amounting to approximately six million won in total market prices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol concerning F and G;

1. Each police statement made to D and H;

1. Photographs of the damaged scene and photographs of the injured party;

1. Investigative report (fluorial information and investigation of the suspect), high gold-purchase ledger copies, and CCTV images of the F stolens;

1. Investigative reports (fluor investigation - photographs of damaged objects, etc.), investigation reports (fluor investigation of the other party against the disposal of stolen objects);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report, investigative report, and interview report by a suspect;

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of intrusion upon residence, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of larceny and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. From among concurrent crimes, it is inevitable to sentence sentence considering the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act: (b) despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, he/she committed the same crime; (c) the nature of the crime is inferior; and (d

However, the defendant reflects his mistake, and is tried simultaneously with the crime of which judgment has already become final and conclusive.