The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above punishment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing) is that the Defendant, in fact, filed a complaint by rapes similar to forced indecent acts, including some false facts in the accusation, but merely exaggerations the fact.

Even if the defendant's conviction is recognized, the sentence of the court below (6 months of imprisonment, one year of suspended execution, and 100 hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of fact, the Defendant may be found to have filed a complaint against a person without accusation due to false facts.

The defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

① The Defendant was investigated as a witness by the prosecution, and “At the first NAV knowledge at the time when she puts his/her writing to his/her her school, speech, and police, all of which were false.

It is one with mutual consent, and it was killed and wounded as a sexual indecent act.

In order to prevent the occurrence of a wound in the body, false horses continued to be made.

It is also known that it is not to reverse the statement even though it is known that the person is detained, but rather can be punished due to false statements.

In the event that the person was kid, the person did not refuse to give friendly guidance and to good the person.

I am good for the human being, and see that they work together with each other, and "I am the same as our husband and wife, why I am the same."

“The Republic of Korea shall also have complied with the certificate of sea traffic.”

“Specific confessions,” and the lower court recognized crimes even on the first trial date.

At the time of the prosecutor's investigation, K and C of the defendant's friendship counseling center V were present as a trusted person at the time of the prosecutor's investigation, and was in charge of the defendant's national defense until the first trial of the court below.

S Attorney at Law is the defendant from the time when the defendant was investigated as a victim of sexual assault.