beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Imprisonment for one year, 8 months of imprisonment for Defendant C, 5,00,00 won for Defendant D, and 5,000 won for Defendant E and F, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who, around February 20, 2002, was appointed as the president of the MM Association and was re-appointed on December 2005, and was pre-determined on December 3, 2009 and has been performing his position until now.
Defendant
B (former standing director) is a person working as the former state of M from October 1, 2002 to February 8, 2010; Defendant C (former N branch head) is a credit secretary of the above M from August 1, 2007 to February 28, 201; Defendant D (former O branch head) is the N branch head from August 1, 2007 to February 28, 201; Defendant E (former credit standing director) is the head of the N branch from August 1, 2007 to February 28, 201; Defendant F (former P branch head) from March 1, 2006 to February 28, 201 to the head of the P branch from February 28, 201 to the date from February 20, 201 to the date from February 1, 206 to the date from February 201 to the date from February 28, 2015.
On November 208, Defendant B, C, D, E, F, and G, the executive staff of the above M, are anticipated to rapidly lower the CD interest rate at the time in the former office of the MM association located in the Dong-gu R during Ansan-si, and as a considerable number of persons is anticipated to be the same in the future, in order to prepare countermeasures against this occurrence, Defendant B made a resolution on the plan to increase the profits of the association by receiving the interest at will of the lending customers at a reduced rate as compared to the CD interest rate without the consent of the above MM lending customers. On November 2008, Defendant B reported the above resolution to Defendant A and consented thereto. Defendant B opened a new meeting around 09:00 on December 2, 2008, Defendant B instructed Defendant C, D, E, F, and G to arbitrarily pay additional dues without the consent of customers.
1. On February 23, 2009, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant B’s head office credit secretary C, at the said head office, instructed S and T to arbitrarily raise the interest rate on the additional interest of the loan customer at the time of the said head office, and S and T, according to the said direction, enter the interest rate at a higher rate than 1.7% without the said victim’s consent.