logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.08.16 2016나16237
압류금 지급 청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. Of the appeal costs, the part pertaining to the participation in the appeal is the intervenor joining the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal, addition, or deletion as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment] The second and third sides of the judgment of the court of first instance are referred to as “D” as “V”.

The “21,096,675,695 won” in part 5-3 of the judgment of the first instance refers to “21,096,676,00 won”, and the “40,308,316,000 won” in the amount on the settlement of accounts for the business year 2007 of the second Table shall be deemed “40,136,494,000 won” in part 5-3 of the judgment of the first instance. [Supplementary part] 1 of the judgment of the first instance is added to “F” in front of “I” in the second sentence.

[A] The part that is deleted] ① The part that “the indication of the truth (Article 107 of the Civil Act) or the part that “the indication of the truth (Article 107) or the part that “the indication of the truth (Article 107 of the Civil Act),” ② the part that “the assertion of invalidation due to an unfair juristic act,” and ③ the part that “the determination of the assertion of an unfair juristic act” is deleted from 16

The 11th judgment of the first instance shall be deleted from the 14th and 15th of the 11st judgment.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow