beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 2016, 2016, the Defendant made access to the victim C (V 54 years of age) who was engaged in the cleaning of toilets from the Goyang-gu B toilet in Gyeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, 2016, and suggested that the Defendant would die, and that he would be married to the victim.
On October 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) the Defendant purchased the Defendant’s low-priced vehicle in the front of the Gyeyang-gu Goyang-gu Godong Winter Park; (b) his own low-priced vehicle in cash with KRW 25 million; and (c) the Defendant is working as a field manager of a construction company that receives KRW 7 million in salary.
At present, in Seoul, we live in the third floor of the 100 million foot in Seoul, and we want to live in Incheon along with the cambial. It was false that us borrowed a little amount of rent cost of KRW 240,000,000,000 to the money of KRW 240,000,000,000.
However, the Defendant was living at KRW 30 million monthly at KRW 50,000,000, and this monthly loan agreement was also made in the name of Doctrine D, and the Defendant was required to pay KRW 735,000 per month when purchasing low-priced Doctrine vehicles with loan from Doctrine company, and the Defendant was under the obligation to pay KRW 26,00,000 per month. The Defendant was under the obligation to receive KRW 26,00,000 per day. However, even if he borrowed money from the injured party, such as that there was little amount of activity at that time, he did not have the ability to use it for the purpose of seeking a deposit for residence with the injured party or to pay it in full.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2.5 million from the injured party on the same day, and received KRW 1,150,000 in total eight times as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of imprisonment) concerning the relevant criminal facts and Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria).