beta
Text
Defendant
Imprisonment with prison labor for A, three years and six months, and the imprisonment for Defendant B, eight months, and the imprisonment for Defendant C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on October 16, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 14, 2016. Defendant B was sentenced to two years and four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on November 30, 2015 and became final and conclusive on December 8, 2015.
[2016 order 313]
1. Crimes against Defendant A’s victim G;
A. On November 1, 2013, Defendant A may grant a working loan for a loan to the victim at the “I” office of the victim G management “I” located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and Defendant A may first repay the card payment to J.
If so, 30 million won will be loaned through other lending companies.
If the head of the Tong is created, he/she shall be given a loan to the relevant account, etc. to manage the fund.
“The purpose of “ was to manage the passbook with the issuance of the passbook (K) from the injured party.”
Defendant
A, while keeping the money deposited in the account as above, he/she arbitrarily consumed and embezzled KRW 26,825,213 as his/her own debt and living expenses from November 1, 2013 to November 7, 2013.
B. On November 4, 2013, Defendant A wanting to offer a working loan in the same way at the “I” office in the preceding paragraph, and Defendant A intended to offer a loan to the victim G, “The loan is changed by opening one package of a plaque that reduces the loan to be sexually dead. The payment of the opening fee will be made within the face value.
“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”
However, the defendant A had no intention or ability to pay the user fee in the name of the victim because he had been liable for approximately KRW 200,000 without any particular property at the time and the living expenses have been deficient.
Defendant
A, as such, by deceiving the victim G and deceiving it, acquired the victim's 820,000 won of the market price from the damaged person and acquired it by delivery.
2. The Defendant A’s fraud against Defendant A’s victim L is around November 29, 2014.