logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.13 2016고정279
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operated Internet shopping mall C by May 2, 2014.

Defendant Company’s transfer of the above company to explain its monthly sales and monthly net income to the higher amount, and to sell its company to “D” website, which is an online site brokerage company, “D”, “The monthly sales of KRW 420 million, monthly net income of KRW 40 million, annual sales of KRW 7 billion: at least KRW 6.5 billion, domestic sales: KRW 6.5 billion, overseas sales: KRW 50 million, annual net income: KRW 300 million, annual sales of KRW 300 million, annual sales of KRW 300 million, and sales of KRW 420 million, and KRW 40 million.

A, contact information E was posted to the effect that the registrant is "A,"

On May 15, 2014, the Defendant reported and visited “D” advertisement at the C Office of the Co., Ltd. on May 15, 2014. The Defendant concealed the existence of the Defendant’s obligation to return to the customers who purchased the goods at the said Company and cancelled or refunded the purchase, and “the total annual sales in 2013 reach KRW 6 billion,” and the sales from May 1, 2014 to December 12, 2014 are more than KRW 200 million.

The net income of each year exceeds 300 million won.

Unless now decided, it will trade another person's test.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

In fact, however, the annual sales of the above company are KRW 1.25 billion in 2012, KRW 2.3 billion in 2013, and KRW 900 million in the first half of 2014, and from May 1, 2014.

5. Until December, 12, the sales amount was KRW 69.4 million, and the annual net profit was not more than KRW 300 million, and the amount of net profit was borne by customers, but the victim did not notify the victims of the obligation to return the amount of the deposited funds to be returned, and the victim became aware of the existence of the obligation to return the deposited funds only after the end of May 2014, which was after the payment of the down payment, and the payment of the remainder was entirely impossible until the date of the payment of the remainder.

arrow