The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Fact-finding: (a) the Defendant: (a) at the time of committing the crime on May 8, 2018, there was a fact that: (b) at the time of committing the crime on May 8, 2018, the Defendant was able to take a bath to the victim D; (c) however, there was no assault against the victim or her bath to other customers; and (d) there was a fact that the victim H was committing the crime in the process of protesting because the victim H did not properly treat the Defendant, the customer, at the time of committing the crime on May 18, 2018; (b) however, there was no fact that the victim h was sicking the victim, or her bath to the victim or other customers; (c) the victim did not throw a sick to the victim; (d) did not interfere with the restaurant business of the victim; and (d) did not have any intention to interfere with

B. The sentencing of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. First of all, on May 8, 2018, the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below after compiling the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim D: (i) was under the influence of alcohol and prevented the Defendant from working on the side; (ii) was under the Defendant’s resistance; (iii) was able to see why the Defendant was blicked by solitary formula; (iv) was flicked on the table; (v) was blicked on the table; (v) was blicked on the table of other customers; and (v) was blicked on the table; and (v) the Defendant was blicked on several occasions; and (v) was blicked on the body of the victim; and (v) was blicked on the body of the victim; and (v) the Defendant was blicked on the body of the victim; and (v) the Defendant was blicked on the body of the victim.