Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for one year and two months, respectively.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From December 1, 2015 to May 24, 2016, Defendants registered the establishment of each D in the name of Defendant A, and from May 25, 2016 to June 22, 2016, Defendants registered each D in the name of Defendant B, respectively.

The Defendants conspired with Defendant A, from May 19, 2016 to June 22, 2016, and Defendant B, from December 1, 2015 to June 22, 2016, 12 inside the “D” located in the second floor and the third floor of the E-si from March 1, 2015 to June 22, 2016, and provided 12 inside the “D”, and 8 inside the shower facilities, etc. to find out 170,000 won in cash or 190,000 won in cash from many unspecified male customers, and arranged sexual intercourse with 4 women of sexual traffic, such as F, upon receiving settlement of 190,000 won in cash from them.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of police officers in relation to G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, U, and V;

1. A letter of authorization from G;

1. Application of the F and W respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. Grounds for calculating the amount additionally collected in accordance with Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic;

1. The collection under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. is intended to deprive the offender of unlawful profits from the act in order to eradicate the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. Therefore, it is reasonable to deem that the scope of the collection is limited to the profits actually acquired by the offender. The scope of the collection is limited to the cases where the offender has paid part of the amount received from the customer, such as arranging sexual traffic, etc., to the sexual traffic female employees or