logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.08 2012가합4721
소유권이전등기등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a)on the ground of the recovery of the true name, Defendant A shall be entitled to real estate listed in Schedule A 1.1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. J district land readjustment project promotion 1) Non-party J district land readjustment project partnership (hereinafter “instant association”)

(A) The Jung-gu Incheon Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”) shall be the land of 484,620 square meters for the land of Jung-gu.

2) On July 13, 1998, the head of Incheon Metropolitan City publicly notified the determination of urban planning and detailed planning zone with respect to the project of this case as L/C publicly notified by Incheon Metropolitan City on July 3, 1998, and on July 13, 2002, the instant association promoted the project of this case with the authorization to establish the association and the authorization to implement the project of this case under Article 16 of the former Land Readjustment Project Act (amended by Act No. 6252, Jan. 8, 200; hereinafter the same shall apply) by the public notification of Incheon Metropolitan City.

B. The instant association: (a) borrowed the first project cost and the trust contract 1); (b) the instant association needed project costs such as the intermediate construction cost in the course of carrying out the instant project; and (c) on December 26, 2007, Nonparty Cra Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Cra Construction”) (hereinafter “Cra Construction”).

(1) On December 27, 2007, 2007, on the following day, the Plaintiff agreed to borrow KRW 9.5 billion from the Plaintiff, and Nonparty 1 and Nonparty 1 and Nonparty 1 and Nonparty 2 and Nonparty 2 and Nonparty 3 and Nonparty 2 (hereinafter

In order to secure the above loan debt, the association of this case entrusted 37 lots of land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay within the project district of this case to the plaintiff, and designated the land as the right to preferential interest in the construction of Crta, and the association of this case set up a pledge on the right to preferential interest in Crta Construction, and agreed to sell and repay the above 37 lots of land until August 31, 2008 by the association of this case until August 2008. 2) In accordance with the above agreement, the association of this case had agreed to sell the above 37 lots of land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay and repay the borrowed money to the plaintiff by December 28, 207 (including each of the land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay Nos. 2, 1 through 29) as the truster association of this case, the trustee of this case, and the first beneficiary of this right to preferential interest.

arrow